Letters to the editor: federal dependence, cyberbullying, cheers to students and others


Editorials and different Opinion content material provide views on points essential to our group and are unbiased from the work of our newsroom reporters.


Have an opinion you need to share with Idaho Statesman readers? Submit a letter to the editor.

Federal dependence

I simply learn an fascinating article about how a lot cash pink states get from the federal authorities compared to blue states. Wyoming will get $56 per particular person, whereas California will get $12. There needs to be a system the place you’re taking the bottom greenback quantity after which apply that to each state. This is equity. This is equality. Why ought to the remainder of the nation must help states that can’t take care of their very own issues?

In truth, I’d say what they will do is apply the greenback quantity to the variety of people who voted in that state. That approach democracy is confirmed. How many instances have you ever heard Republicans ranting and raving about welfare? Yet, that is the proper instance of welfare on steroids. If these states can’t present for the folks then they could have to boost taxes. Why ought to somebody in New York or California have to supply welfare to a state that may’t take care of fiscal coverage?

Jerry Johnson, Payette


Cyberbullying is a serious explanation for melancholy and suicide amongst youth, in keeping with the Institute of Psychiatry. Cyberbullying has change into extra prevalent with the onslaught of expertise. Research exhibits that regardless of efforts to coach folks about cyberbullying, to determine indicators and signs, and to show adolescents to watch out on-line, cyberbullying persists. Unfortunately, these strategies are ineffective and permit cyberbullying to perpetuate.

According to the Center for Digital Ethics and Policy, regardless of legislators’ efforts, the prevailing legal guidelines usually are not clear sufficient to stop cyberbullying from occurring. A federal regulation addressing cyberbullying has not been established due to potential interference with the First Amendment. So as a substitute, the duty for creating cyberbullying laws was pushed onto every state. Because the Internet doesn’t know state boundaries, few protections put into place can totally shield people from cyberbullying.

The public must push the federal government to create a federal regulation in opposition to cyberbullying. We want a regulation that protects susceptible youth from cyberbullying with out infringing on our First Amendment rights. Our authorities must act swiftly to keep away from any extra harmful penalties. Contact your state representatives in the present day about fixing the cyberbullying drawback. Tomorrow could also be too late for some.

Alexandrah Crow, Boise

Cheers to college students

Bravo to the younger Idahoans who recognized a major problem affecting the lives of Idaho youth, collected information, reached out to different college students across the state, and developed an inexpensive first step to deal with the suicide epidemic in our state. Shame on our elected officers who didn’t give them a listening to and ignored their decision. Surely in our small state that has the tenth highest variety of suicides within the US (with 61% involving firearms and lots of involving youngsters), affordable adults, together with these within the NRA, can come along with our younger advocates to agree on some security measures that may cut back that horrible toll.

As a former U.S.Congressional employees member who is aware of that it typically takes a number of years to achieve a consensus on essential points, I urge our dedicated and inventive pupil advocates for saving younger lives not to surrender however to achieve out to extra of Idaho’s elected officers and to the NRA. I’ve hope that at some point considerate and compassionate folks will come collectively to make modifications that may save extra lives, together with the lives of our youngsters. Don’t surrender. Your efforts are too essential.

Diane Dorius, Boise

Support Gelsomino

As District 21 residents, enterprise homeowners, and voters, we’re proudly casting our votes for Dom Gelsomino for Idaho House District 21 Seat A race. Dom’s monitor document as a group chief, public servant, and concerned mother or father is unmatched in his race. He has the expertise, the imaginative and prescient and the outcomes essential to be a profitable lawmaker beginning day one.

His tireless marketing campaign efforts — having knocked over 2,000 doorways since early March, obtained help from over 100 particular person donors, 4 companies and Idaho’s schooling group, replicate his dedication towards listening to his constituents, as are the objectives and imaginative and prescient he’s articulated for the twenty first District and Idaho. Dom’s dedication to illustration, civil discourse, and being a constructive voice District 21 gained our help.

We imagine he will probably be a real advocate for all Idahoans, will work tirelessly towards a greater future for Idaho. We urge our District 21 neighbors to forged their vote for Dom Gelsomino on May 17.

Leasa and Phil Stricklin, Meridian

Tiring advertisements

It’s not disinformation or misinformation, it’s mendacity! We must watch, learn or hear media mania and political commercials for months now. It’s no higher than being consistently hit with outright propaganda. The coming months usually are not one thing to look ahead to as we’re deliberately divided into hostile camps and offended voters as a substitute of the “United States”. Please don’t neglect to vote anyway.

Sheila Robbins, Boise

Against CRT

In regard to Bob Kustra’s protection of important race idea, he clearly has not learn “Critical Race Theory: An Introduction” by Delgado and Stefancic by which they state “critical race theory questions the very foundations of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law.” I discover it troublesome to imagine Kustra would defend CRT if he understood how profoundly intolerant it’s.

John Caldwell, Meridian

Support Koellisch

My vote goes to Tracey Koellisch within the District 14 Seat A race. I believe she just isn’t getting sufficient recognition for the laborious work she has carried out to guard conservatism previous to operating on this race. Tracey has a confirmed monitor document of working for the residents of Eagle, Ada County and the state, and has been prepared to do it at no cost. She’s been a volunteer for years on finish, combating for our rights when present legislators refuse to supply outcomes. We want illustration within the Statehouse and Tracey will do exactly that. Unlike the others in her race, she has already confirmed herself and none of it has been for egocentric ambition. We want a robust conservative on this seat who isn’t afraid to deal with robust matters. That’s precisely why she has my vote on May 17. I do know she is going to characterize her constituents nicely.

Jeriese Dodd, Eagle

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.