Investigating January 6th | The New Yorker


This content material will also be considered on the positioning it originates from.

Listen and subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Google | Wherever You Listen

Sign up to obtain our weekly e-newsletter of one of the best New Yorker podcasts.

With a choose declaring that Donald Trump “more likely than not” dedicated a felony in his try to overturn the 2020 Presidential election, the congressional committee investigating January sixth is racing to complete its work earlier than the looming midterm elections. Amy Davidson Sorkin and the authorized scholar Jeannie Suk Gersen discuss with David Remnick in regards to the legislation and the politics of holding Trump accountable. But legal conviction, they agree, doesn’t equal accountability—and may solely have inflammatory results on a drastically divided nation. “There’ve been ideas thrown around about . . . conviction, [that] maybe we could just disqualify him from running again,” Davidson Sorkin says. “I strongly believe that that’s not the answer. This has to be accomplished by democratic means. And, ultimately, it has to be done on Election Day.”

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.